Animal Farm Full Movie Part 1

Body PaintingWhat is body paint Is it different from paints you purchase at art stores Can you use acrylic paint on the skin Great news for you Silly Farm carries. Latest environmental news, features and updates. Pictures, video and more. C8zsg2dTMo/hqdefault.jpg' alt='Animal Farm Full Movie Part 1' title='Animal Farm Full Movie Part 1' />Animal Farm has 2,018,106 ratings and 36,389 reviews. Shannon Giraffe Days said This is a book Ive been meaning to read for ages but never got around. We all know Finn, Poe, and Rey will be back in Star Wars The Last Jedi but what about the rest of our favorite characters Directed by Molly Mathieson. With John Simm, Chris Bedwell, Julie Bindel, Leif Botger. A look at the story behind the bestiality tape ANIMAL FARM. From its production. Farm Sanctuary is an American animal protection organization, founded in 1986 as an advocate for farm animals. It was Americas first shelter for farm animals. It. The Artificial Intelligence Revolution Part 1. PDF We made a fancy PDF of this post for printing and offline viewing. PETAs action alerts allows you to easily contact companies, universities, government agencies, and others to improve the lives of animals used for food, clothing. Buy it here. Or see a preview. Note The reason this post took three weeks to finish is that as I dug into research on Artificial Intelligence, I could not believe what I was reading. It hit me pretty quickly that whats happening in the world of AI is not just an important topic, but by far THE most important topic for our future. So I wanted to learn as much as I could about it, and once I did that, I wanted to make sure I wrote a post that really explained this whole situation and why it matters so much. Not shockingly, that became outrageously long, so I broke it into two parts. This is Part 1Part 2 is here. We are on the edge of change comparable to the rise of human life on Earth. Vernor Vinge. What does it feel like to stand here It seems like a pretty intense place to be standingbut then you have to remember something about what its like to stand on a time graph you cant see whats to your right. So heres how it actually feels to stand there Which probably feels pretty normalThe Far FutureComing Soon. Imagine taking a time machine back to 1. When you get there, you retrieve a dude, bring him to 2. Its impossible for us to understand what it would be like for him to see shiny capsules racing by on a highway, talk to people who had been on the other side of the ocean earlier in the day, watch sports that were being played 1,0. This is all before you show him the internet or explain things like the International Space Station, the Large Hadron Collider, nuclear weapons, or general relativity. This experience for him wouldnt be surprising or shocking or even mind blowingthose words arent big enough. He might actually die. But heres the interesting thingif he then went back to 1. And the 1. 50. 0 guy would be shocked by a lot of thingsbut he wouldnt die. It would be far less of an insane experience for him, because while 1. The 1. 50. 0 guy would learn some mind bending shit about space and physics, hed be impressed with how committed Europe turned out to be with that new imperialism fad, and hed have to do some major revisions of his world map conception. But watching everyday life go by in 1. No, in order for the 1. BC, before the First Agricultural Revolution gave rise to the first cities and to the concept of civilization. If someone from a purely hunter gatherer worldfrom a time when humans were, more or less, just another animal speciessaw the vast human empires of 1. And then what if, after dying, he got jealous and wanted to do the same thing. If he went back 1. BC and got a guy and brought him to 1. BC, hed show the guy everything and the guy would be like, Okay whats your point who cares. For the 1. BC guy to have the same fun, hed have to go back over 1. In order for someone to be transported into the future and die from the level of shock theyd experience, they have to go enough years ahead that a die level of progress, or a Die Progress Unit DPU has been achieved. So a DPU took over 1. Agricultural Revolution rate, it only took about 1. The post Industrial Revolution world has moved so quickly that a 1. DPU to have happened. Watch The Crew Tube Free. This patternhuman progress moving quicker and quicker as time goes onis what futurist Ray Kurzweil calls human historys Law of Accelerating Returns. This happens because more advanced societies have the ability to progress at a faster rate than less advanced societiesbecause theyre more advanced. This works on smaller scales too. The movie Back to the Future came out in 1. In the movie, when Michael J. Fox went back to 1. TVs, the prices of soda, the lack of love for shrill electric guitar, and the variation in slang. It was a different world, yesbut if the movie were made today and the past took place in 1. The character would be in a time before personal computers, internet, or cell phonestodays Marty Mc. Fly, a teenager born in the late 9. Marty Mc. Fly was in 1. This is for the same reason we just discussedthe Law of Accelerating Returns. The average rate of advancement between 1. Soadvances are getting bigger and bigger and happening more and more quickly. This suggests some pretty intense things about our future, right Kurzweil suggests that the progress of the entire 2. He believes another 2. A couple decades later, he believes a 2. All in all, because of the Law of Accelerating Returns, Kurzweil believes that the 2. If Kurzweil and others who agree with him are correct, then we may be as blown away by 2. DPU might only take a couple decadesand the world in 2. This isnt science fiction. Its what many scientists smarter and more knowledgeable than you or I firmly believeand if you look at history, its what we should logically predict. So then why, when you hear me say something like the world 3. Cool. but nahhhhhhh Three reasons were skeptical of outlandish forecasts of the future 1 When it comes to history, we think in straight lines. When we imagine the progress of the next 3. When we think about the extent to which the world will change in the 2. This was the same mistake our 1. Its most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking exponentially. If someone is being more clever about it, they might predict the advances of the next 3. Theyd be more accurate, but still way off. In order to think about the future correctly, you need to imagine things moving at a much faster rate than theyre moving now. The trajectory of very recent history often tells a distorted story. First, even a steep exponential curve seems linear when you only look at a tiny slice of it, the same way if you look at a little segment of a huge circle up close, it looks almost like a straight line. Second, exponential growth isnt totally smooth and uniform. Kurzweil explains that progress happens in S curves An S is created by the wave of progress when a new paradigm sweeps the world. The curve goes through three phases 1. Slow growth the early phase of exponential growth2. Rapid growth the late, explosive phase of exponential growth3. A leveling off as the particular paradigm matures. If you look only at very recent history, the part of the S curve youre on at the moment can obscure your perception of how fast things are advancing. The chunk of time between 1. Microsoft, Google, and Facebook into the public consciousness, the birth of social networking, and the introduction of cell phones and then smart phones. That was Phase 2 the growth spurt part of the S. But 2. 00. 8 to 2. Someone thinking about the future today might examine the last few years to gauge the current rate of advancement, but thats missing the bigger picture. In fact, a new, huge Phase 2 growth spurt might be brewing right now. Our own experience makes us stubborn old men about the future. We base our ideas about the world on our personal experience, and that experience has ingrained the rate of growth of the recent past in our heads as the way things happen. Were also limited by our imagination, which takes our experience and uses it to conjure future predictionsbut often, what we know simply doesnt give us the tools to think accurately about the future. When we hear a prediction about the future that contradicts our experience based notion of how things work, our instinct is that the prediction must be naive. If I tell you, later in this post, that you may live to be 1. Thats stupidif theres one thing I know from history, its that everybody dies. And yes, no one in the past has not died. But no one flew airplanes before airplanes were invented either. So while nahhhhh might feel right as you read this post, its probably actually wrong. The fact is, if were being truly logical and expecting historical patterns to continue, we should conclude that much, much, much more should change in the coming decades than we intuitively expect. COWSPIRACY The Sustainability Secret. Directors Note The science and research done on the true impacts of animal agriculture is always growing. The statistics used in the film were based on the best information we had available while producing the film. We will continually update this list with further resources as they become available GREENHOUSE GASES Animal agriculture is responsible for 1. Livestocks Long Shadow environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome 2. 00. 6Transportation exhaust is responsible for 1. Greenhouse gas emissions from this sector primarily involve fossil fuels burned for road, rail, air, and marine transportation. Livestocks Long Shadow environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome 2. 00. 6Environmental Protection Agency. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. Livestock and their byproducts account for at least 3. CO2 per year, or 5. Goodland, R Anhang, J. Livestock and Climate Change What if the key actors in climate change were pigs, chickens and cowsGoodland, Robert Anhang, Jeff. Livestock and Climate Change What if the key actors in climate change are. World. Watch. NovemberDecember 2. Hickman, Martin. Study claims meat creates half of all greenhouse gases. Independent. November 2. Hyner, Christopher. A Leading Cause of Everything One Industry That Is Destroying Our Planet and Our Ability to Thrive on It. Georgetown Environmental Law Review. October 2. 3, 2. 01. NewMethane is 2. CO2 on a 2. Shindell, Drew T, et al. Improved Attribution of Climate Forcing to Emissions. Science. Vaidyanathan, Sayathri. How Bad of a Greenhouse Gas is Methane The global warming potential of the gaseous fossil fuel may be consistently underestimated. Scientific American. December 2. 2, 2. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Climate Change 2. Direct Global Warming Potential. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change NewMethane has a global warming potential 8. CO2 on a 2. 0 year time frame. Shindell, Drew T, et al. Improved Attribution of Climate Forcing to Emissions. Science. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Climate Change 2. Direct Global Warming Potentials. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change newLivestock is responsible for 6. Livestock Long Shadow environmental issues and options. FAO. Rome. 2. 00. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States. U. S. Energy Information Administration. March 3. 1, 2. 01. Emissions for agriculture projected to increase 8. Tilman, David Clark, Michael. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature. Vol. 5. 15. November 2. 01. 4Energy related emissions expected to increase 2. Carbon Dioxide Emissions to 2. Energy Global. 0. January 2. 01. 5World Energy Outlook 2. Factsheet. International Energy Agency. International Energy Outlook 2. U. S. Energy Information. May 1. 1, 2. 01. 6US Methane emissions from livestock and natural gas are nearly equal. Overview of Greenhouse Gases. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Key facts and findings. By the numbers GHG emissions by livestock. FAO. NewInventory of U. S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1. United States Environmental Protection Agency newCows produce 1. Ross, Phillip. Cow Farts Have Larger Greenhouse Gas Impact Than Previously Thought Methane Pushes Climate Change. International Business Times. November, 2. 01. 32. Rough average of 1. CH4 globally per day. Miller, Scot M, et al. Anthropegnic emissions of methane in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 1. 10. No. 5. October 2. 01. 3 newConverting to wind and solar power will take 2. Infographic How Much it Would Cost for the Entire Planet to Switch to Renewable Energy. Inhabitat. 2. 4 September, 2. Evans Pritchard, Ambrose. Paris climate deal to ignite a 9. The Telegraph. 2. October, 2. 01. 5 NewEven without fossil fuels, we will exceed our 5. CO2e limit by 2. 03. Oppenlander, Richard A. Food Choice and Sustainability Why Buying Local, Eating Less Meat, and Taking Baby Steps Wont Work. Minneapolis, MN Langdon Street, 2. Print. Source calculation is based on http www. GHG are attributed to animal ag. Reducing methane emissions would create tangible benefits almost immediately. Industry Leaders, including Energy Companies, Forge Partnerships to Advance Climate Solutions and Reduce Short Lived Climate Pollutants. Climate Summit 2. WATER Fracking hydraulic fracturing water use ranges from 7. Draft Plan to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources. EPA. February 2. 01. Geetanjali, Chauhan, et al. Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas and its Environmental Impacts. Research Journal of Recent Sciences. Vol. 4 ISC 2. 01. NewAnimal agriculture water consumption ranges from 3. Summary of Estimated Water Use in the United States in 2. United States Geological Service. Pimentel, David, et al. Water Resources Agricultural and Environmental Issues. Bio. Science. 2. 00. Agriculture is responsible for 8. US water consumption. How Important is Irrigation to U. S. Agriculture USDA Economic Research Service. October, 2. 01. 6Growing feed crops for livestock consumes 5. US.   xvJacobson, Michael F. Six Arguments For a Greener Diet How a More Plant based Diet Could Save Your Health and the Environment. Chapter 4 More and Cleaner Water. Washington, DC Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2. Californians use 1. Close to Half is associated with meat and dairy products. Fulton, Julian, et al. Californias Water Footprint. Pacific Institute. December 2. 01. 22,5. NOTE. The amount of water used to produce 1lb. We choose to use in the film the widely cited conservative number of 2. US beef from Dr. George Borgstrom, Chairman of Food Science and Human Nutrition Dept of College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, Impacts on Demand for and Quality of land and Water. Robbins, John. Earth Save Healthy People Healthy Planet. Pimentel, David, et al. Water Resources Agricultural and Environmental Issues. Bio. Science 2. 00. NewWater Content of Things Data Table 1. The Worlds Water 2. Beckett, J. L, Oltjen, J. W Estimation of the Water Requirement for Beef Production in the United States. Journal of Animal Science. Water. Environmental Working Group. Water footprint of crop and animal products a comparison. Water Footprint Network. NewOppenlander, Richard A. Food Choice and Sustainability Why Buying Local, Eating Less Meat, and Taking Baby Steps Wont Work. Minneapolis, MN Langdon Street, 2. Print. 47. 7 gallons of water are required to produce 1lb. Water. Environmental Working Group. Food Facts How Much Water Does it Take to Produce. Water Education Foundation. New1,0. 00 gallons of water are required to produce 1 gallon of milk. Hoekstra, Arjen Y. The water footprint of food. Water for Food. Mekonnen, Mesfin M. Hoekstra, Arjen Y. A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products. Ecosystems 2. 01. US is by private homes. US is for animal agriculture. Jacobson, Michael F. Six Arguments For a Greener Diet How a More Plant based Diet Could Save Your Health and the Environment. Chapter 4 More and Cleaner Water. Washington, DC Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2. Animal Agriculture is responsible for 2. Mekonnen, Mesfin M. Hoekstra, Arjen Y. A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products. Ecosystems 2. 01. Gerbens Leenes, P. W. et al. The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef A comparitive study in different countries and production systems. Water Resources and Industry. Vol. 1 2, March June 2. Pages 2. 5 3. 6Herrero, Mario, et al. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Oppenlander DDS, Richard. Freshwater Abuse and Loss. Where Is It All Going Forks over Knives.